The Texas federal court case raises the issue of whether the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as Obamacare, violates the Origination Clause of the Constitution because it originated in the Senate instead of the House as required for all bills raising revenue.
According to Franks, Obamacare contains 17 tax provisions raising approximately $500 billion in taxes, including the individual mandate to purchase health insurance, which the Supreme Court ruled could only be constitutional, if at all, under Congress’s power to tax.
“If the Senate can introduce the largest tax increase in American history by simply peeling off the House number from a six-page unrelated bill, which does not even raise taxes, and pasting it on the ‘Senate Health Care Bill,’ and then claim with a straight face that the resulting bill originated in the House, then the American ‘rule of law’ has become no rule at all,” said Franks in a statement released Friday.
Franks is the sponsor of House Resolution 153 with 56 co-sponsors, which according to Franks, expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that Obamacare violated the Origination Clause. Last week, Franks also held a contentious hearing on the topic before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.
Last fall, Congressman Franks and his colleagues filed a similar brief in the related case of Sissel v. HHS in the D.C. Circuit which was heard last week and which Mr. Franks attended.