The State of Arizona, on behalf of the Arizona Game and Fish Department, on Wednesday filed two motions aimed at protecting the state’s interest in the Mexican wolf reintroduction program and successful recovery of the endangered wolf subspecies that inhabits east-central Arizona and New Mexico.
Arizona filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit Center for Biological Diversity v. Sally Jewell. The suit concerns the recently-revised 10(j) Rule that governs the management of Mexican wolves in Arizona and New Mexico. The state filed the motion to intervene to defend its trust authority over wildlife conservation in Arizona and its involvement in the revision of the 10(j) Rule.
The state also filed a motion to dismiss the suit based on the court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiffs are unable to demonstrate that their interests have suffered due to the revised 10(j) Rule.
“Given that the new rule governing Mexican wolf recovery provides more habitat and potential for population growth than the rule and permit it replaced, the plaintiffs cannot demonstrate that their interests have suffered as required by law,” said Arizona Game and Fish Commission Chair Robert Mansell.
The revised 10(j) Rule increases the Mexican wolf population objective from at least 100 animals to a range of 300 to 325. It also eliminates the previous recovery area where wolves could live to a three-zone area that eventually expands their range ten-fold.
“The new 10(j) rule is based on sound scientific principles and helps address critical stakeholder concerns that have long been the primary obstacles to successful recovery of wolves. It’s a positive step in the right direction,” said Mansell.
The Arizona Game and Fish Department is also working with the Arizona Attorney General’s office to challenge the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s failure to develop an updated Mexican wolf recovery plan that incorporates Mexico, which has historically held 90 percent of the habitat for Mexican wolves.
“We should intervene in a case where the interests of the State and our populace will be negatively affected by the expansion of this questionable program. We are already seeing evidence of cattle and livestock kill as a result of man’s intervention, aka introduction of an apex predator that will not stay put in an arbitrarily set range. To my knowledge wolves don’t much care about lines in a map,” said AZ State Representative Mark Finchem.
AZ State Representative Bob Thorpe said that he has had several discussions with the Director of the Arizona Game and Fish Department, Larry Voyles, about the shared interests and concerns that Arizona and New Mexico have regarding the Mexican Wolf Program. Thorpe said that he has the utmost confidence in Dir. Voyles and in AZGF, and that he encouraged Voyles to build a working relationship with New Mexico regarding the Wolf Program and the new 10J rules, and offered his personal assistance in achieving outcomes beneficial to both states.
Related articles:
Grijalva urges expansion of Mexican gray wolf territory, opposition grows
Wolf attacks on humans in North America
Release of “Mexican Grey Wolf” example of U S Govt forest, game mismanagement
Are Mexican wolves in Arizona actually wolf-dog hybrids
Arizona issues notice of intent to sue feds over Mexican wolf recovery plan development