During the November 2015 Tucson City Council election, Tucson Metro Chamber did nothing to protect business owners from the re-election of business unfriendly councilperson, now the Board of Directors of the Chamber unanimously has voted an “Absolute No” on the proposed Mandatory Paid Time Off ordinance the Tucson City Council is proposing that a stakeholder group consider.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, the Chamber claimed that “if the stakeholder group is indeed formed, the Chamber will actively engage in persuading that committee to recommend to the Council that it not go forward with this ordinance.”
In its statement, the Chamber’s Board of Directors says it “implores the City Council to end the discussion on Mandatory Paid Time Off immediately. With a looming $42 million general fund deficit this next fiscal year and projected $63.3 million deficit over the next four years, the Council’s attention must be on growing Tucson’s economy and giving business a reason to come to Tucson, grow in Tucson and stay in Tucson. The climate for business in Tucson is not good at the present time; without a robust business-led economic upturn, these deficits will only grow larger.”
The Chamber statement reads in part:
The Board of Directors, along with a growing multi-industry coalition, believes mandating paid sick leave is a gross intrusion into the employer-employee relationship by a municipal government. In order to ensure consistent expectations for both workers and industry, policies affecting that relationship must be made at the federal and state level. A patchwork of regulations at the municipal level is nearly impossible to comply with and can result in irreparable harm to job creators by adding to business expenses, complicating work schedules and requiring another layer of regulatory compliance.
The ordinance, deceptively named “Safe and Sick Time,” would require all employers to provide paid time off for employees, regardless of their employment status. The City would mandate that for every 30 hours worked, an employee would earn at a minimum 1 hour of paid time off. If an employer has fewer than 10 employees, employees could accrue up to 40 hours. If the employer has more than 10 employees, that accrual would be up to 56 hours.
This ordinance is ill-conceived and will in turn hurt those it aims to help. The underlying issue is this: you can’t ask an employee if they were actually ill, a likely HIPAA violation. So in reality, so called “Safe and Sick Time” is really just mandatory paid time off.
The Tucson Metro Chamber has done little to promote a strong local economy and has worked to protect and defend politicians.