Institute of Peace defunding proposed

Photo: Contestants pose backstage while waiting for the judges’ decision at the USIP-supported 2014 Election Anthem contest.

Photo: Contestants pose backstage while waiting for the judges’ decision at the USIP-supported 2014 Election Anthem contest.
Photo: Contestants pose backstage while waiting for the judges’ decision at the USIP-supported 2014 Election Anthem contest.
This week, Arizona Congressman Matt Salmon proposed defunding the Institute of Peace as part of his effort to “cut wasteful and duplicative federal spending.” The House voted in a bipartisan manner nearly three years ago to defund this organization, which a former USIP board member noted ‘performs little worthwhile service to the taxpayer but rather that it forwards a political agenda.’

The Institute of Peace was established in 1984 to advance the cause of international peace and conflict resolution. The Institute spends millions of dollars on hosting meetings to facilitate communication and negotiate between groups, primarily in areas where the U.S. military or State Department are already active. The Institute also holds numerous symposia in Washington, D.C. on topics such as global innovation, legitimacy and peace processes, and the effects of Iranian sanctions.

The FY 2014 funding level for the Institute for Peace was $37 million. For FY 2015, the Administration has requested $35.3 million in funds for the organization.

According to Salmon, in an era of ever-growing federal spending, even the Obama Administration has sought to curtail the funds wasted on this program—requesting almost $2 million less for its budget in FY 2015.

“For my eighth SOS bill, I introduced legislation that would eliminate funding for the Institute of Peace,” said Salmon. “The Institute of Peace was established by Congress in 1984 as an independent nonprofit corporation that receives millions in federal funds to achieve ambiguous goals such as ‘promote international peace and conflict resolution’ and ‘provide, promote, and support peace education and research’ programs.”

“The Department of State is best suited to advance efforts toward international peace through diplomatic channels and USAID can easily prioritize grant funding toward those objectives,” concluded salmon. “It is foolish to waste taxpayer dollars on a private organization with a redundant purpose and negligible efficacy.”

About ADI Staff Reporter 15461 Articles
Under the leadership of Editor-in -Chief Huey Freeman, our team of staff reporters bring accurate,timely, and complete news coverage.