SUMMARY REPT-GROUP DETAIL CONSOLIDATED ELECTIONS
NOVEMBER 3, 2015
PIMA COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA
RUN DATE:11/04/15 02:16 AM
TOTAL VOTES % POLLS EARLY PROV
PRECINCTS COUNTED (OF 248). . . . . 248 100.00
REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL . . . . . 564,716
BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL. . . . . . . 155,168 28,506 126,662 0
BALLOTS CAST - BLANK. . . . . . . 44 .03 24 20 0
VOTER TURNOUT - TOTAL . . . . . . 27.48
VOTER TURNOUT - BLANK . . . . . . .01
CITY OF TUCSON MAYOR
(VOTE FOR) 1
(WITH 135 OF 135 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
ROTHSCHILD, JONATHAN (DEM) . . . . 49,555 93.39 8,778 40,777 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 3,506 6.61 1,240 2,266 0
CITY OF TUCSON COUNCIL MEMBER WARD 1
(VOTE FOR) 1
(WITH 135 OF 135 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
ROMERO, REGINA (DEM) . . . . . . 36,109 56.74 6,144 29,965 0
HUNT, BILL (REP) . . . . . . . 27,323 42.94 6,566 20,757 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 205 .32 46 159 0
CITY OF TUCSON COUNCIL MEMBER WARD 2
(VOTE FOR) 1
(WITH 135 OF 135 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
CUNNINGHAM, PAUL (DEM) . . . . . 36,141 56.75 6,172 29,969 0
LAWTON, KELLY (REP). . . . . . . 27,351 42.95 6,527 20,824 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 189 .30 46 143 0
CITY OF TUCSON COUNCIL MEMBER WARD 4
(VOTE FOR) 1
(WITH 135 OF 135 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
SCOTT, SHIRLEY C. (DEM) . . . . . 35,032 55.11 5,767 29,265 0
BURKHOLDER, MARGARET (REP) . . . . 28,356 44.60 6,897 21,459 0
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 184 .29 48 136 0
CITY OF TUCSON PROPOSITION 201
(VOTE FOR) 1
(WITH 135 OF 135 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,526 65.50 8,949 33,577 0
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,400 34.50 4,132 18,268 0
CITY OF TUCSON PROPOSITION 403
(VOTE FOR) 1
(WITH 135 OF 135 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,353 71.65 8,585 37,768 0
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,344 28.35 4,350 13,994 0
CITY OF TUCSON PROPOSITION 404
(VOTE FOR) 1
(WITH 135 OF 135 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,994 68.83 8,389 35,605 0
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,921 31.17 4,364 15,557 0
CITY OF TUCSON PROPOSITION 405
(VOTE FOR) 1
(WITH 135 OF 135 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,532 39.25 4,840 20,692 0
NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,517 60.75 8,162 31,355 0